Friday, November 24, 2006

Why no Outrage over the Democrat Plan?

Remember during the 2004 presidential election when every news outlet was had reporters asking if Kerry was right that President Bush had a "secret plan"? Yea, I know that John Kerry intentionally accused President Bush of having secret plans involving everything up to and including milk prices, but I'm talking about a supposed plan to bring back the draft. Remember that? Remember the outrage?

Every media outlet was doing a story, or an opinion poll, or both on whether or not this was believable. There was so much talk about this untrue rumor that it allowed the Democrats to scare a number of college students and their parents (many who remember vividly the draft protest era) into voting for Kerry, Kind, and the rest of the Dem ticket. On June 4, 2004 NSNBC, talking about what Newsweek found out, lead off a story with these words:

"It's one of the Internet's most persistent rumors: The Pentagon and the White House are quietly laying plans to reinstate the military draft—as soon as the 2004 presidential election is over."

- Could the Draft Come Back?

Well, it didn't happen. There was no secret plan. Surprise! We wonder how that rumor got started.

But, where are those same media outlets now that a Democrat, U.S. Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., in the new majority of the US House is serious about bringing back the draft? He has a real plan. Well, it was a one day story and then you don't hear about it again, right? No news story here.

Where are the students who are outraged? In 2004 on the college campuses, including ones I'm familiar with in Western Wisconsin, students were putting up posters and forwarding emails spreading these artfully-placed rumors telling of the evils of Bush's secret. Ask any college student from that time and you will be told that the secret Bush draft plans were widely discussed, believed, and was a big reason for students to vote against the President.

So, what do we hear from students on the Democrat's real plan to reinstate the draft? Nothing. Well, almost nothing. I did read in a Madison student newspaper the following:

"U.S. Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., is not insane. His proposal to reinstate the draft has been met with a virulent response from the left and the right, and the outrage is understandable. However, most bewildered critics and Americans hearing about it on the news don’t have any more than an elementary understanding of Rangel’s proposal. Offering an idea this controversial is meant to trigger a larger debate: How can we sustain our military in a long-term struggle against pseudo-Islamic extremism and the philosophy of terror?"

- Rangel's draft idea spurs vital debate

Unbelievable. So let me get this straight... if someone accuses the President of having a "secret plan" to reinstitute the draft when that is not even true, then it’s a major reason why students should vote against him... but, if someone in the new majority of Congress has an actual plan to reinstitute the draft, then we should applaud his good idea because it "spurs vital debate"? Give me a break! I hope this is not how all students are reacting. But their silence is deafening.

What message is being sent? I believe the message is that it is okay to lie or at least spread unsubstantiated accusations in an attempt to sway crucial numbers of gullible voters in close elections when it serves the politicians or the political party supported by the students and the media. And, of course, when the truth comes out that it was the very politicians they support who actually have these bad, evil ideas, well then I guess that the idea is no longer a bad one. It must be kind of situational thing you see, it's only a bad idea if the person is a member of the party you disagree with. Do I have the rules right? Did you learn this in college?


Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Reflections on the 2006 campaign

Well as anyone who knows me will tell you I am disappointed and a little stunned by the results of the 2006 elections. Yes, I realized there was an anti-Republican sentiment out there. It started out being an anti-incumbent movement and somehow turned to Anti-GOP. There's lots of reasons for that, we could debate them all day long and not agree 100%. But, that's how politics works. When things in the country or state are not going well, the public generally wants a change in leadership. If they new Democrat majorities in Congress and the State Senate do not provide the results the public thinks they should, the pendulum will swing back.

I was disappointed that the media stopped focusing on the issues in Third District Congressional race (of which there are plenty) and in the end only focused on whether or not candidate Paul R. Nelson was wrong to air his TV ad. I wish he would have chosen his words better in the ad so the discussion could have focused on Congressman Kind's record (or lack of it) and not on the ad itself. Sigh.

Also, I was not prepared for the tsunami (as my good friend Sen. Dale Schultz described it) that swept out of office many excellent elected officials. I think everyone agrees that when State Treasurer Jack Voight, who served the state with distinction, was an innocent victim of the voters wrath, then there was more going on than just looking at who should be in office!

Several other close friends I will miss including Sen. Ron Brown, Sen. Dave Zien, Rep. Rob Kreibich, and Rep. Steve Freese. Mark Green is a good man that would have made an excellent Governor! I have known him personally for some time now and was looking forward to working with him. I hope they all stay active and continue to fight for the issues I know they feel closely about.

A couple pleasant things happened on Election Day, including the election of J.B. Van Hollen as Attorney General. If you know me, you know that as a former Police Chief this race mattered greatly to me and therefore I was involved in JB's campaign. I also got to know and respect 29th Assembly Rep-elect John Murtha during the campaign. He was working hard and deserved to win the seat! I'm thrilled that these two fine men were elected!!

So, we will need to take a few days to reflect on what happened and why. We already had some good meetings on that this past Saturday in the Dells. But then we need to get back to work speaking up and fighting for the values we believe in. After all, it's less than 2 years until the next election!

-Dennis.